Quadro P2000 vs Radeon Pro W5500X

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6964

G3D Mark Score

7351

Performance Difference

Radeon Pro W5500X is 5.6% faster than Quadro P2000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro P20005120 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
25%
low75%
medium49%
high20%
ultra4%
1440pLow
12%
low49%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

5 GB VRAM Β· 6,964 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon Pro W5500X8192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
41%
low86%
medium68%
high38%
ultra18%
1440pLow
24%
low68%
medium38%
high18%
ultra11%
4KLimited
13%
low38%
medium18%
high11%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 7,351 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon Pro W5500X performs 5.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro P2000 and Radeon Pro W5500X.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro P2000 and Radeon Pro W5500X

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:40
TMUs:64
Vram:5120 MB
L1 Cache:384 kB
L2 Cache:1280 kB
Core Clock:1076 MHz
Boost Clock:1480 MHz
Shading Units:1024
Transistor Count:4,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:94.72
Manufacturing Process:16 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.031 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP106
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Launch Price:$585
Release Date:February 6 2017
Performance Ranking Position:346
AMD

Radeon Pro W5500X

The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:96
Vram:8192 MB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1187 MHz
Boost Clock:1757 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:6,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:168.7
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):125 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.398 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 14
Architecture:RDNA 1.0 (2019βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:December 11 2019
Performance Ranking Position:345

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P2000 and Radeon Pro W5500X