Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon HD4650

NVIDIA

Quadro NVS 510M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon HD4650

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

238

G3D Mark Score

240

Performance Difference

Radeon HD4650 is 0.8% faster than Quadro NVS 510M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro NVS 510M1024 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 238 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon HD4650N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon HD4650 performs 0.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro NVS 510M and Radeon HD4650.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro NVS 510M and Radeon HD4650

NVIDIA

Quadro NVS 510M

The Quadro NVS 510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 238 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:1024 MB
L1 Cache:768 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:450 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:3,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:21.60
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6912 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF110
Architecture:Fermi 2.0 (2010βˆ’2014)
Release Date:February 22 2011
Performance Ranking Position:733
AMD

Radeon HD4650

The Radeon HD4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. Boost clock: 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 240 points. Launch price was $299.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:88
Vram:null
L1 Cache:352 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Boost Clock:800 MHz
Shading Units:1408
Transistor Count:2,640 million
Texture Fill Rate:70.40
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):500 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.253 TFLOPS

General Information

Design:reference
Codename:Cayman
Architecture:TeraScale 3 (2010βˆ’2013)
Launch Price:$299
Release Date:December 14 2010
Performance Ranking Position:623

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro NVS 510M and Radeon HD4650