Quadro M3000M vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

Quadro M3000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

5574

G3D Mark Score

10064

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 1060 is 80.6% faster than Quadro M3000M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro M3000M4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
19%
low70%
medium30%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 5,574 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTX 10606144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
46%
low84%
medium77%
high44%
ultra22%
1440pLow
26%
low77%
medium44%
high22%
ultra6%
4KLow
13%
low44%
medium22%
high6%
ultra6%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 10,064 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 1060 performs 80.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 1060.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:64
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:384 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1050 MHz
Shading Units:1,024
Transistor Count:5,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:67.20
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.15 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM204
Architecture:Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Release Date:August 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:411
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:160
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:960 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1607 MHz
Boost Clock:1733 MHz
Shading Units:2560
Max Temperature:94 Β°C
Transistor Count:7,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:277.3
Manufacturing Process:16 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):180 Watt
Floating Point Performance:8.873 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP104
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:May 27 2016
Performance Ranking Position:137

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M3000M and GeForce GTX 1060