Quadro M1000M vs GeForce GTX 770M

NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2845

G3D Mark Score

2784

Performance Difference

Quadro M1000M is 2.2% faster than GeForce GTX 770M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro M1000M4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,845 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTX 770M3072 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

3 GB VRAM Β· 2,784 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro M1000M performs 2.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro M1000M and GeForce GTX 770M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro M1000M and GeForce GTX 770M

NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:993 MHz
Boost Clock:1072 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:31.78
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):40 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.017 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$200.89
Release Date:August 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:594
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770M

The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:24
TMUs:80
Vram:3072 MB
L1 Cache:80 kB
L2 Cache:384 kB
Core Clock:811 MHz
Boost Clock:797 MHz
Shading Units:960
Transistor Count:2,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:63.76
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.53 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK106
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$189.99
Release Date:May 30 2013
Performance Ranking Position:603

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M1000M and GeForce GTX 770M