Quadro K600 vs GeForce 920M

NVIDIA

Quadro K600

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

722

G3D Mark Score

717

Performance Difference

Quadro K600 is 0.7% faster than GeForce 920M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K6001024 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%
1440pLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%
4KLimited
5%
low5%
medium5%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 722 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce 920MN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K600 performs 0.7% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K600 and GeForce 920M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K600 and GeForce 920M

NVIDIA

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:240
Vram:1024 MB
L1 Cache:240 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:797 MHz
Boost Clock:902 MHz
Shading Units:2880
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:216.5
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.196 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110B
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$5,265
Release Date:July 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:318
NVIDIA

GeForce 920M

The GeForce 920M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:8
TMUs:24
Vram:null
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:965 MHz
Boost Clock:993 MHz
Shading Units:256
Texture Fill Rate:23.83
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):16 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.5084 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM108
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Release Date:March 25 2016
Performance Ranking Position:864

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K600 and GeForce 920M