Quadro K5200 vs Quadro P3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6149

G3D Mark Score

6384

Performance Difference

Quadro P3000 is 3.8% faster than Quadro K5200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K52008192 MB

016GB32GB

1080pMedium

40%

low85%

medium67%

high37%

ultra17%

1440pLow

23%

low67%

medium37%

high17%

ultra10%

4KLimited

12%

low37%

medium17%

high10%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM · 6,149 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Quadro P30006144 MB

016GB32GB

1080pMedium

32%

low84%

medium62%

high22%

ultra12%

1440pLow

17%

low62%

medium22%

high12%

ultra6%

4KLimited

low22%

medium12%

high6%

ultra6%

📊 Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM · 6,384 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.

1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro P3000 performs 3.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K5200 and Quadro P3000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K5200 and Quadro P3000

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48

TMUs:192

Vram:8192 MB

Core Clock:667 MHz

Boost Clock:771 MHz

Shading Units:2304

Transistor Count:7,080 million

Texture Fill Rate:148.0

Manufacturing Process:28 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt

Floating Point Performance:3.553 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110B

Architecture:Kepler (2012−2018)

Launch Price:$1,699.74

Release Date:July 22 2014

Performance Ranking Position:391

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.