Quadro K5200 vs GeForce GTX 770

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

6149

G3D Mark Score

5961

Performance Difference

Quadro K5200 is 3.2% faster than GeForce GTX 770

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K52008192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
40%
low85%
medium67%
high37%
ultra17%
1440pLow
23%
low67%
medium37%
high17%
ultra10%
4KLimited
12%
low37%
medium17%
high10%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 6,149 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

GeForce GTX 7704096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
19%
low70%
medium30%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 5,961 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K5200 performs 3.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K5200 and GeForce GTX 770.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K5200 and GeForce GTX 770

NVIDIA

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:192
Vram:8192 MB
Core Clock:667 MHz
Boost Clock:771 MHz
Shading Units:2304
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:148.0
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):150 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.553 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110B
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$1,699.74
Release Date:July 22 2014
Performance Ranking Position:391
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770

The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:1046 MHz
Boost Clock:1085 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Max Temperature:98 Β°C
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:138.9
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):230 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.333 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$399
Release Date:May 30 2013
Performance Ranking Position:398

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K5200 and GeForce GTX 770