Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P500

NVIDIA

Quadro K3000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P500

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1618

G3D Mark Score

1659

Performance Difference

Quadro P500 is 2.5% faster than Quadro K3000M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K3000M2048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,618 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro P500N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro P500 performs 2.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K3000M and Quadro P500.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K3000M and Quadro P500

NVIDIA

Quadro K3000M

The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:48 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:654 MHz
Shading Units:576
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:31.39
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7534 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$155
Release Date:June 1 2012
Performance Ranking Position:748
NVIDIA

Quadro P500

The Quadro P500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:16
Vram:null
L1 Cache:96 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:1455 MHz
Boost Clock:1518 MHz
Shading Units:256
Transistor Count:1,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:24.29
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):18 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7772 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP108
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Release Date:January 5 2018
Performance Ranking Position:740

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K3000M and Quadro P500