Quadro K2000 vs GeForce GTX 550 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1582

G3D Mark Score

1558

Performance Difference

Quadro K2000 is 1.5% faster than GeForce GTX 550 Ti

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K20002048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,582 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTX 550 Ti3072 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

3 GB VRAM Β· 1,558 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K2000 performs 1.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K2000 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K2000 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:32 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:954 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:1,270 million
Texture Fill Rate:30.53
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):51 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7327 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK107
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:March 1 2013
Performance Ranking Position:756
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 550 Ti

The GeForce GTX 550 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 15 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 116W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,558 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:24
TMUs:32
Vram:3072 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:384 kB
Core Clock:900 MHz
Shading Units:192
Max Temperature:100 Β°C
Transistor Count:1,170 million
Texture Fill Rate:28.80
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):116 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6912 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF116
Architecture:Fermi 2.0 (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$149
Release Date:March 15 2011
Performance Ranking Position:761

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000 and GeForce GTX 550 Ti