Quadro K1200 vs FirePro W5000

NVIDIA

Quadro K1200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS

FirePro W5000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2965

G3D Mark Score

2967

Performance Difference

FirePro W5000 is 0.1% faster than Quadro K1200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro K12004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,965 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

FirePro W50002048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
6%
low24%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 2,967 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FirePro W5000 performs 0.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro K1200 and FirePro W5000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro K1200 and FirePro W5000

NVIDIA

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:954 MHz
Boost Clock:1033 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:33.06
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):45 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.0578 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$321.97
Release Date:January 28 2015
Performance Ranking Position:586

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:192 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:825 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:39.60
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.267 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:August 7 2012
Performance Ranking Position:585

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K1200 and FirePro W5000