Quadro FX 2000 vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

RADEON XPRESS 200M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

18

G3D Mark Score

23

Performance Difference

RADEON XPRESS 200M is 27.8% faster than Quadro FX 2000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 2000128 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 18 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

RADEON XPRESS 200MN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, RADEON XPRESS 200M performs 27.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 2000 and RADEON XPRESS 200M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 2000 and RADEON XPRESS 200M

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:128 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:625 MHz
Shading Units:192
Transistor Count:1,170 million
Texture Fill Rate:20.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):62 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.48 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF106
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$599
Release Date:December 24 2010
Performance Ranking Position:902
AMD

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:160
Vram:null
L2 Cache:4 MB
Core Clock:1000 MHz
Boost Clock:1030 MHz
Shading Units:2560
Texture Fill Rate:164.8
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):50 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.274 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 12
Architecture:RDNA 1.0 (2019βˆ’2020)
Release Date:June 15 2020
Performance Ranking Position:283

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 2000 and RADEON XPRESS 200M