Opteron 248 vs Athlon 64 3500+

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

Passmark Score

585

Passmark Score

570

Performance Difference

Opteron 248 is 2.6% faster than Athlon 64 3500+

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this CPU comparison, Opteron 248 performs 2.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Opteron 248 and Athlon 64 3500+.

Both processors are popular choices for gaming PCs. Consider factors like core count, boost clock speeds, power consumption (TDP), and gaming vs productivity performance when choosing between these CPUs.

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Opteron 248 and Athlon 64 3500+

Opteron 248

The Opteron 248 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the SledgeHammer (2003−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 940. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 585 points. Launch price was $12.

General Information

Type:server

Designer:AMD

Launch Price:$12

Release Date:Novembro 2003 (22 years ago)

Architecture Codename:SledgeHammer (2003−2005)

Performance Ranking Position:3397

Technical Specifications

Cores:1

Threads:1

Die Size:193 mm2

L1 Cache:128 kB

L2 Cache:1 MB

L3 Cache:0 kB

Max Frequency:2.2 GHz

64-Bit Support:+

Transistor Count:106 million

Process Technology:130 nm

Compatibilidade Com Windows 11:-

Compatibility

Socket:940

Power Consumption (TDP):89 Watt

Max Processors In Config:2

Memory

Athlon 64 3500+

The Athlon 64 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2001 (24 years ago). It is based on the San Diego (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 570 points. Launch price was $59.