GeForce MX150 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA

GeForce MX150

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2252

G3D Mark Score

2209

Performance Difference

GeForce MX150 is 1.9% faster than Radeon Pro WX 3200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce MX1502048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 2,252 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon Pro WX 32004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
9%
low37%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low10%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,209 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce MX150 performs 1.9% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce MX150 and Radeon Pro WX 3200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce MX150 and Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA

GeForce MX150

The GeForce MX150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,252 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:24
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:144 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:937 MHz
Boost Clock:1038 MHz
Shading Units:384
Transistor Count:1,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:24.91
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):10 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7972 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP108
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Release Date:May 17 2017
Performance Ranking Position:657
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. Core clock: 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:160 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:1082 MHz
Shading Units:640
Transistor Count:2,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:34.62
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):65 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.385 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Polaris 23
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$199
Release Date:July 2 2019
Performance Ranking Position:659

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX150 and Radeon Pro WX 3200