GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050 / C2070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960A

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3465

G3D Mark Score

3428

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 960A is 1.1% faster than Tesla C2050 / C2070

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 960AN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Tesla C2050 / C20706144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
21%
low67%
medium37%
high10%
ultra10%
1440pLimited
10%
low37%
medium10%
high10%
ultra4%
4KLimited
6%
low10%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 3,428 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 960A performs 1.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2050 / C2070.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2050 / C2070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 960A

The GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,465 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:40
Vram:null
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1029 MHz
Boost Clock:1085 MHz
Shading Units:640
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:43.40
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.389 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Release Date:March 13 2015
Performance Ranking Position:546
NVIDIA

Tesla C2050 / C2070

The Tesla C2050 / C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,428 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:56
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:896 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Core Clock:574 MHz
Shading Units:448
Transistor Count:3,100 million
Texture Fill Rate:32.14
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):238 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.028 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF100
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Release Date:July 25 2011
Performance Ranking Position:569

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2050 / C2070