GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs FireStream 9370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS

FireStream 9370

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2525

G3D Mark Score

2528

Performance Difference

FireStream 9370 is 0.1% faster than GeForce GTX 650 Ti

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti2048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
6%
low24%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 2,525 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

FireStream 93704096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,528 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, FireStream 9370 performs 0.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 650 Ti and FireStream 9370.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 650 Ti and FireStream 9370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,525 points. Launch price was $149.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:64
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:64 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:928 MHz
Shading Units:768
Max Temperature:105 Β°C
Transistor Count:2,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:59.39
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):110 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.425 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK106
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$149
Release Date:October 9 2012
Performance Ranking Position:633

FireStream 9370

The FireStream 9370 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 23 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. Core clock: 825 MHz. It has 1600 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,528 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:160 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:825 MHz
Shading Units:1600
Transistor Count:2,154 million
Texture Fill Rate:66.00
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.64 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Cypress
Architecture:TeraScale 2 (2009βˆ’2015)
Release Date:June 23 2010
Performance Ranking Position:631

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 650 Ti and FireStream 9370