GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GTS 350M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

375

G3D Mark Score

381

Performance Difference

GeForce GTS 350M is 1.6% faster than GeForce GT 625

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GT 6251024 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 375 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTS 350M1024 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 381 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTS 350M performs 1.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GTS 350M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GTS 350M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625

The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:44
Vram:1024 MB
L1 Cache:704 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:607 MHz
Shading Units:352
Max Temperature:105 Β°C
Transistor Count:3,100 million
Texture Fill Rate:26.75
Desempenho Compute:30x
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):200 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.8554 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF100
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$279
Release Date:May 31 2010
Performance Ranking Position:618
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 350M

The GeForce GTS 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $129.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:1024 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:256 kB
Core Clock:783 MHz
Shading Units:192
Max Temperature:100 Β°C
Transistor Count:1,170 million
Texture Fill Rate:25.06
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):106 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6013 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF106
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$129
Release Date:September 13 2010
Performance Ranking Position:791

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GTS 350M