GeForce 310 vs Radeon X1900 GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 310

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon X1900 GT

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

143

G3D Mark Score

146

Performance Difference

Radeon X1900 GT is 2.1% faster than GeForce 310

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce 310512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 143 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon X1900 GT256 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
1440pLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%
4KLimited
10%
low10%
medium10%
high10%
ultra10%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

0 GB VRAM Β· 146 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon X1900 GT performs 2.1% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce 310 and Radeon X1900 GT.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce 310 and Radeon X1900 GT

NVIDIA

GeForce 310

The GeForce 310 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 143 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:8
TMUs:24
Vram:512 MB
L1 Cache:192 kB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:928 MHz
Boost Clock:941 MHz
Shading Units:384
Texture Fill Rate:22.58
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):33 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.7227 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM108
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Release Date:March 13 2015
Performance Ranking Position:810
AMD

Radeon X1900 GT

The Radeon X1900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It includes 84 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 146 points. Launch price was $899.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:192
TMUs:336
Vram:256 MB
L0 Cache:2.6 MB
L1 Cache:3 MB
L2 Cache:6 MB
L3 Cache:80 MB
Core Clock:1387 MHz
Boost Clock:2394 MHz
Shading Units:5376
Transistor Count:57,700 million
Ray Tracing Cores:84
Texture Fill Rate:804.4
Manufacturing Process:5 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):300 Watt
Floating Point Performance:51.48 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 31
Architecture:RDNA 3.0 (2022βˆ’2026)
Launch Price:$899
Release Date:November 3 2022
Performance Ranking Position:21

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 310 and Radeon X1900 GT