GRID K520 vs Quadro K2200

GRID K520

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K2200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3516

G3D Mark Score

3580

Performance Difference

Quadro K2200 is 1.8% faster than GRID K520

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GRID K520N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro K22004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 3,580 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K2200 performs 1.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GRID K520 and Quadro K2200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GRID K520 and Quadro K2200

GRID K520

The GRID K520 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 745 MHz. It has 1536 Γ—2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,516 points. Launch price was $3,599.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32 Γ—2
TMUs:128 Γ—2
Vram:null
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:745 MHz
Shading Units:1536 Γ—2
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:95.36 Γ—2
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.289 TFLOPS Γ—2

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$3,599
Release Date:July 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:540
NVIDIA

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:40
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:1046 MHz
Boost Clock:1124 MHz
Shading Units:640
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:44.96
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):68 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.439 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$395.75
Release Date:July 22 2014
Performance Ranking Position:534

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K520 and Quadro K2200