GRID K280Q vs Quadro M1000M

GRID K280Q

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2840

G3D Mark Score

2845

Performance Difference

Quadro M1000M is 0.2% faster than GRID K280Q

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GRID K280QN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro M1000M4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,845 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro M1000M performs 0.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GRID K280Q and Quadro M1000M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GRID K280Q and Quadro M1000M

GRID K280Q

The GRID K280Q is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,840 points. Launch price was $1,875.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:null
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:745 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:95.36
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.289 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$1,875
Release Date:June 28 2013
Performance Ranking Position:595
NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:993 MHz
Boost Clock:1072 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:31.78
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):40 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.017 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$200.89
Release Date:August 18 2015
Performance Ranking Position:594

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K280Q and Quadro M1000M