GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3100

GRID K240Q

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3100

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2541

G3D Mark Score

2584

Performance Difference

Radeon Pro WX 3100 is 1.7% faster than GRID K240Q

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GRID K240QN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Radeon Pro WX 31004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,584 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon Pro WX 3100 performs 1.7% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro WX 3100.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro WX 3100

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:null
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:745 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:95.36
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.289 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$469
Release Date:June 28 2013
Performance Ranking Position:628
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3100

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:925 MHz
Boost Clock:1219 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:2,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:39.01
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):65 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.248 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Lexa
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$199
Release Date:June 12 2017
Performance Ranking Position:624

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro WX 3100