GRID K2 vs Quadro K4100M

GRID K2

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K4100M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2737

G3D Mark Score

2773

Performance Difference

Quadro K4100M is 1.3% faster than GRID K2

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GRID K2N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro K4100M4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,773 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro K4100M performs 1.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GRID K2 and Quadro K4100M.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GRID K2 and Quadro K4100M

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 745 MHz. It has 1536 Γ—2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32 Γ—2
TMUs:128 Γ—2
Vram:null
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:745 MHz
Shading Units:1536 Γ—2
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:95.36 Γ—2
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):225 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.289 TFLOPS Γ—2

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$5,199
Release Date:May 11 2013
Performance Ranking Position:611
NVIDIA

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:96
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:96 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:706 MHz
Shading Units:1152
Transistor Count:3,540 million
Texture Fill Rate:67.78
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.627 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK104
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$1,499
Release Date:July 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:604

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID K2 and Quadro K4100M