FirePro W7000 vs Tesla K20Xm

FirePro W7000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20Xm

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

4304

G3D Mark Score

4403

Performance Difference

Tesla K20Xm is 2.3% faster than FirePro W7000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro W70004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,304 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Tesla K20Xm6144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
22%
low68%
medium38%
high11%
ultra11%
1440pLow
12%
low48%
medium11%
high11%
ultra5%
4KLimited
7%
low11%
medium11%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 4,403 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Tesla K20Xm performs 2.3% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro W7000 and Tesla K20Xm.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro W7000 and Tesla K20Xm

FirePro W7000

The FirePro W7000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,304 points. Launch price was $899.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:320 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:950 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:76.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.432 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$899
Release Date:June 13 2012
Performance Ranking Position:477
NVIDIA

Tesla K20Xm

The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. Core clock: 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:224
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:224 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:732 MHz
Shading Units:2688
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:164.0
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):235 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.935 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$7,699
Release Date:November 12 2012
Performance Ranking Position:473

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro W7000 and Tesla K20Xm