FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M395X

FirePro S9000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

5059

G3D Mark Score

5120

Performance Difference

Radeon R9 M395X is 1.2% faster than FirePro S9000

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro S9000N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Radeon R9 M395X4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
19%
low70%
medium30%
high14%
ultra4%
1440pLow
10%
low42%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
5%
low14%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 5,120 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon R9 M395X performs 1.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M395X.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M395X

FirePro S9000

The FirePro S9000 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 900 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,059 points. Launch price was $2,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:112
Vram:null
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Core Clock:900 MHz
Shading Units:1792
Transistor Count:4,313 million
Texture Fill Rate:100.8
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.226 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Tahiti
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$2,499
Release Date:August 24 2012
Performance Ranking Position:441
AMD

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. Core clock: 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:128
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:512 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:723 MHz
Shading Units:2048
Transistor Count:5,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:92.54
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.961 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Amethyst
Architecture:GCN 3.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Release Date:May 5 2015
Performance Ranking Position:438

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M395X