FirePro RG220 vs Radeon HD 8310E

FirePro RG220

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8310E

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

335

G3D Mark Score

341

Performance Difference

Radeon HD 8310E is 1.8% faster than FirePro RG220

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

FirePro RG220512 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM Β· 335 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon HD 8310EN/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Radeon HD 8310E performs 1.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between FirePro RG220 and Radeon HD 8310E.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for FirePro RG220 and Radeon HD 8310E

FirePro RG220

The FirePro RG220 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in February 25 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. Core clock: 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $1,099.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:48
Vram:512 MB
L1 Cache:192 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:825 MHz
Shading Units:768
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:39.60
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):350 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.267 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Pitcairn
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$1,099
Release Date:February 25 2013
Performance Ranking Position:619
AMD

Radeon HD 8310E

The Radeon HD 8310E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. Core clock: 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:56
Vram:null
L1 Cache:112 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:800 MHz
Shading Units:1120
Transistor Count:2,154 million
Texture Fill Rate:44.80
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):175 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.792 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Cypress
Architecture:TeraScale 2 (2009βˆ’2015)
Release Date:February 25 2010
Performance Ranking Position:724

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro RG220 and Radeon HD 8310E