Quadro FX 2500M vs Quadro P4200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

218

G3D Mark Score

10376

Performance Difference

Quadro P4200 is 4659.6% faster than Quadro FX 2500M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro FX 2500M512 MB

016GB32GB

1080pLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

1440pLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

4KLimited

low4%

medium4%

high4%

ultra4%

📊 Performance Analysis

1 GB VRAM · 218 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.

1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.

4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro P42008192 MB

016GB32GB

1080pHigh

55%

low86%

medium83%

high61%

ultra28%

1440pMedium

33%

low83%

medium61%

high28%

ultra11%

4KLow

17%

low61%

medium28%

high11%

ultra5%

📊 Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM · 10,376 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pHigh settings for most AAA titles at 60 FPS.

1440pMedium settings recommended. May drop below 60 FPS.

4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚡Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

🚀Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro P4200 performs 4659.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro FX 2500M and Quadro P4200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro FX 2500M and Quadro P4200

Quadro FX 2500M

The Quadro FX 2500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 218 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32

TMUs:80

Vram:512 MB

L2 Cache:256 kB

Core Clock:610 MHz

Shading Units:240

Transistor Count:1,400 million

Texture Fill Rate:48.80

Manufacturing Process:55 nm

Power Consumption (TDP):189 Watt

Floating Point Performance:0.6221 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GT200B

Architecture:Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)

Launch Price:$3,499

Release Date:November 11 2008

Performance Ranking Position:815

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.