Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs Quadro P2200

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3100

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

2584

G3D Mark Score

9386

Performance Difference

Quadro P2200 is 263.2% faster than Radeon Pro WX 3100

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon Pro WX 31004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,584 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro P22005120 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
34%
low75%
medium59%
high30%
ultra14%
1440pLow
18%
low59%
medium30%
high14%
ultra4%
4KLimited
9%
low30%
medium14%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

5 GB VRAM Β· 9,386 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro P2200 performs 263.2% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon Pro WX 3100 and Quadro P2200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon Pro WX 3100 and Quadro P2200

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 3100

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:128 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:925 MHz
Boost Clock:1219 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:2,200 million
Texture Fill Rate:39.01
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):65 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.248 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Lexa
Architecture:GCN 4.0 (2016βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$199
Release Date:June 12 2017
Performance Ranking Position:624
NVIDIA

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:40
TMUs:80
Vram:5120 MB
L1 Cache:480 kB
L2 Cache:1280 kB
Core Clock:1000 MHz
Boost Clock:1493 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:4,400 million
Texture Fill Rate:119.4
Manufacturing Process:16 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):75 Watt
Floating Point Performance:3.822 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GP106
Architecture:Pascal (2016βˆ’2021)
Release Date:June 10 2019
Performance Ranking Position:281

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 3100 and Quadro P2200