Athlon 64 3300+ vs Celeron 925

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

Passmark Score

522

Passmark Score

525

Performance Difference

Celeron 925 is 0.6% faster than Athlon 64 3300+

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this CPU comparison, Celeron 925 performs 0.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Athlon 64 3300+ and Celeron 925.

Both processors are popular choices for gaming PCs. Consider factors like core count, boost clock speeds, power consumption (TDP), and gaming vs productivity performance when choosing between these CPUs.

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Athlon 64 3300+ and Celeron 925

Athlon 64 3300+

The Athlon 64 3300+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Abril 2004 (21 years ago). It is based on the NewCastle (2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: 754. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 522 points.

General Information

Type:desktop

Designer:AMD

Release Date:Abril 2004 (21 years ago)

Architecture Codename:NewCastle (2004)

Performance Ranking Position:3467

Technical Specifications

Cores:1

Threads:1

Die Size:144 mm2

L1 Cache:128 kB

L2 Cache:256 kB

L3 Cache:0 kB

Max Frequency:2.4 GHz

64-Bit Support:+

Transistor Count:105 million

Process Technology:130 nm

Compatibilidade Com Windows 11:-

Compatibility

Socket:754

Power Consumption (TDP):89 Watt

Max Processors In Config:1

Memory

Celeron 925

The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2011 (14 years ago). Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points.