
Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 6600H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4509Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,578 vs 18,749).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4509Y, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 6600H
2022Xeon Silver 4509Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4509Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,578 vs 18,749).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4509Y, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4509Y better than Ryzen 5 6600H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600H | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600H | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 259 FPS | 355 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600H | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 298 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 6600H | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 464 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 332 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600H and Xeon Silver 4509Y


Ryzen 5 6600H
Ryzen 5 6600H
The Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,578 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Silver 4509Y
Xeon Silver 4509Y
The Xeon Silver 4509Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 18,749 points. Launch price was $563.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 6600H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4509Y offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Silver 4509Y has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600H versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4509Y — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 6600H (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600H uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600H scores 18,578 against the Xeon Silver 4509Y's 18,749 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Silver 4509Y. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600H vs 22.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4509Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600H | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+10% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+27% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 22.5 MB (total)+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 6 nm-14% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 18,578 | 18,749 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 6600H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4509Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 6600H | Xeon Silver 4509Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












