Ryzen 5 6600H vs Xeon W-1350

CPU

GPU

Ryzen 5 6600H

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon W-1350

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Ryzen 5 6600H

6 / 12

18,578

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-1350

6 / 12

18,742

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 5 6600H

2022

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,578 vs 18,742).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1350, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 20 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 20 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 5 6600H needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 6600H.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 6600H

2022

Xeon W-1350

2021

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 80W, a 35W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 20 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P750, while Ryzen 5 6600H needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 6600H.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (18,578 vs 18,742).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1350, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 20 PCIe lanes.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon W-1350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon W-1350.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌77.8% higher power demand at 80W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600H moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-1350 better than Ryzen 5 6600H?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1350 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 6600H is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-1350 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-1350 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-1350 is the smarter buy today. Xeon W-1350 is at an unclear MSRP at $255 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (73.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 6600H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 5 6600H Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1350 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 6600H	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	167 FPS	246 FPS
medium	145 FPS	229 FPS
high	117 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	217 FPS
medium	122 FPS	184 FPS
high	98 FPS	148 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	79 FPS	151 FPS
medium	72 FPS	128 FPS
high	57 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	87 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 6600H Open Xeon W-1350

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 5 6600H	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	353 FPS	315 FPS
medium	294 FPS	267 FPS
high	259 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	221 FPS
1440p
low	306 FPS	280 FPS
medium	259 FPS	239 FPS
high	235 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	227 FPS	222 FPS
medium	196 FPS	191 FPS
high	179 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	146 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 6600H Open Xeon W-1350

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 5 6600H	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	464 FPS	469 FPS
medium	457 FPS	469 FPS
high	414 FPS	440 FPS
ultra	344 FPS	380 FPS
1440p
low	464 FPS	469 FPS
medium	400 FPS	463 FPS
high	360 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	345 FPS
4K
low	340 FPS	385 FPS
medium	284 FPS	337 FPS
high	246 FPS	293 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	242 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 6600H Open Xeon W-1350

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 5 6600H	Xeon W-1350
1080p
low	464 FPS	469 FPS
medium	464 FPS	469 FPS
high	464 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	469 FPS
1440p
low	464 FPS	469 FPS
medium	464 FPS	469 FPS
high	464 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	464 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	464 FPS	469 FPS
medium	464 FPS	469 FPS
high	420 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	392 FPS

Open Ryzen 5 6600H Open Xeon W-1350

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 6600H and Xeon W-1350

Ryzen 5 6600H

The Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,578 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-1350

The Xeon W-1350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,742 points. Launch price was $255.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 6600H and Xeon W-1350 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600H versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-1350 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1350 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 6600H uses the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Xeon W-1350 uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 6600H scores 18,578 against the Xeon W-1350's 18,742 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-1350. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600H vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1350.

Feature	Ryzen 5 6600H	Xeon W-1350
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz	5 GHz+11%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+33%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	6 nm-57%	14 nm
Architecture	Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	18,578	18,742
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,140
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,104

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 6600H uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1350 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 5 6600H	Xeon W-1350
Socket	FP7	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 6600H) / Yes (Xeon W-1350). The Xeon W-1350 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P750), while the Ryzen 5 6600H requires a dedicated GPU.