
Xeon Gold 5317
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4410T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5317
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4410T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 26 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,088 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.8% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,448).
Xeon Gold 5317
2021Xeon Silver 4410T
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.8% larger total L3 cache (26 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4410T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 26 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,088 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,448).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5317 better than Xeon Silver 4410T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5317 | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5317 | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 394 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5317 | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 641 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 610 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 481 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 376 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 307 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5317 | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 671 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 592 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 601 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 446 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 333 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5317 and Xeon Silver 4410T

Xeon Gold 5317
Xeon Gold 5317
The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T
The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5317 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Gold 5317 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Silver 4410T (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5317 uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5317 scores 27,448 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5317. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317 vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5317 | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 20 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+11% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 26.25 MB+46% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 27,448 | 27,245 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5317 uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5317 | Xeon Silver 4410T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













