
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4116
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,777 vs 14,918).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
2020Xeon Silver 4116
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4116 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,777 vs 14,918).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4116, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4116 better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 266 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 340 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U and Xeon Silver 4116


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,777 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
The Xeon Silver 4116 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 14,918 points. Launch price was $1,002.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4116 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4116 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4116 — a 31% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses the Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U scores 14,777 against the Xeon Silver 4116's 14,918 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Silver 4116. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4116.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+37% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 2.1 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16.5 MB (total)+106% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir-U PRO (Zen 2) (2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,777 | 14,918 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4116 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U | Xeon Silver 4116 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












