
Xeon Max 9480
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Max 9480
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,913 vs 84,013).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,380 less on MSRP ($11,600 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Max 9480
2023Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+184.4% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,380 less on MSRP ($11,600 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,913 vs 84,013).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8592+ better than Xeon Max 9480?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 815 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 738 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 704 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 398 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1066 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 953 FPS | 849 FPS |
| high | 813 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 670 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 761 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 532 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 644 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 494 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Max 9480 and Xeon Platinum 8592+

Xeon Max 9480
Xeon Max 9480
The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
The Xeon Max 9480 packs 56 cores / 112 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon Max 9480 uses the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Max 9480 scores 82,913 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480 vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 56 / 112 | 64 / 128+14% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.9 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 112.5 MB | 320 MB (total)+184% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 82,913 | 84,013+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 55,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Max 9480) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).
| Feature | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | HPC Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Max 9480 launched at $12980 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($12980 vs $11600), the Xeon Platinum 8592+ is $1380 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Max 9480 delivers 6.4 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the Xeon Platinum 8592+ the 12.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Max 9480 | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $12980 | $11600-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.4 | 7.2+12% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













