
Xeon 6747P
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6747P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,098 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 330W instead of 350W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 45,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
Xeon 6747P
2025Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,098 less on MSRP ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.7 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 330W instead of 350W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6747P across 16 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 45,000).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6747P better than Xeon Platinum 8570?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 849 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 730 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 641 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 737 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 364 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1034 FPS | 971 FPS |
| medium | 916 FPS | 875 FPS |
| high | 789 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 670 FPS | 654 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 848 FPS | 793 FPS |
| medium | 727 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6747P and Xeon Platinum 8570

Xeon 6747P
Xeon 6747P
The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

Xeon Platinum 8570
Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6747P packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6747P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6747P scores 101,685 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 8.2% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,960, a 2% lead for the Xeon 6747P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 18,960 (81.4% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.
| Feature | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96 | 56 / 112+17% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+29% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 288 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+4% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 101,685+8% | 93,722 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 65,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,000+2% | 1,960 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+137% | 18,960 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6747P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6747P) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the Xeon 6747P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6747P) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).
| Feature | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High Performance Server | Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6747P launched at $6497 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($6497 vs $9595), the Xeon 6747P is $3098 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6747P delivers 15.7 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Xeon 6747P the 46.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6747P | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6497-32% | $9595 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.7+60% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













