EPYC 9375F vs Xeon Platinum 8570

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9375F

32 Cores64 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9375F

32 / 64

95,768

+2.2%

Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 / 112

93,722

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9375F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,289 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 26,020).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).

EPYC 9375F

2024

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.4% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,289 less on MSRP ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($5,306 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9375F across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 26,020).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 18.0 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $5,306 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9375F better than Xeon Platinum 8570?

Yes. EPYC 9375F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 19.4% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data, 37.2% better Geekbench multi-core, 2.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9375F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.4% more average FPS across 24 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9375F is the better fit. You are getting 37.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9375F is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9375F is $4,289 cheaper on MSRP at $5,306 MSRP versus $9,595 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.4% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 84.8% better value on MSRP (18.0 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9375F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 56/112. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9375F Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	315 FPS	188 FPS
medium	290 FPS	165 FPS
high	240 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	155 FPS
medium	230 FPS	131 FPS
high	178 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	70 FPS
medium	157 FPS	63 FPS
high	120 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	725 FPS	282 FPS
medium	618 FPS	250 FPS
high	485 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	421 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	579 FPS	230 FPS
medium	510 FPS	208 FPS
high	419 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	341 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	143 FPS
medium	300 FPS	131 FPS
high	270 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	239 FPS	99 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	923 FPS	910 FPS
medium	748 FPS	838 FPS
high	675 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	572 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	724 FPS	782 FPS
medium	584 FPS	716 FPS
high	515 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	433 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	528 FPS
medium	421 FPS	444 FPS
high	374 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	309 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon Platinum 8570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	1141 FPS	971 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	875 FPS
high	902 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	813 FPS	654 FPS
1440p
low	890 FPS	793 FPS
medium	784 FPS	691 FPS
high	688 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	650 FPS	572 FPS
medium	579 FPS	514 FPS
high	515 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9375F Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9375F and Xeon Platinum 8570

EPYC 9375F

The EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.85 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,768 points. Launch price was $5,306.

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9375F packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8570 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9375F versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9375F (base: 3.85 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9375F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9375F scores 95,768 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 2.2% lead for the EPYC 9375F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,981 vs 1,960, a 41.3% lead for the EPYC 9375F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,020 vs 18,960 (31.4% advantage for the EPYC 9375F). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9375F vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	56 / 112+75%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+20%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.85 GHz+83%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	95,768+2%	93,722
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	65,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,981+52%	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	26,020+37%	18,960

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9375F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The EPYC 9375F supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9375F) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9375F) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the EPYC 9375F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9375F) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6000	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9375F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: EPYC 9375F targets Data Center / Frequency Optimized, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9375F rivals Xeon 6766E; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9375F	Xeon Platinum 8570
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Frequency Optimized	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9375F launched at $5306 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($5306 vs $9595), the EPYC 9375F is $4289 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9375F delivers 18.0 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the EPYC 9375F the 59.5% better value option.