
EPYC 7773X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7773X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+137.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 300 MB).
- ✅Costs $795 less on MSRP ($8,800 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,536 vs 1,960).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅+27.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (300 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌9% HIGHER MSRP$9,595 MSRPvs$8,800 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
EPYC 7773X
2022Xeon Platinum 8570
2023Why buy it
- ✅+137.3% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+156% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 300 MB).
- ✅Costs $795 less on MSRP ($8,800 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 350W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+27.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,536 vs 1,960).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8570 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,960 vs 45,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (300 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌9% HIGHER MSRP$9,595 MSRPvs$8,800 MSRP
- ❌25% higher power demand at 350W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7773X better than Xeon Platinum 8570?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 850 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 955 FPS | 971 FPS |
| medium | 867 FPS | 875 FPS |
| high | 742 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 639 FPS | 654 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 738 FPS | 793 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 691 FPS |
| high | 547 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 454 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7773X and Xeon Platinum 8570

EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X
The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

Xeon Platinum 8570
Xeon Platinum 8570
The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 1,960, a 24.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 18,960 (81.4% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128+14% | 56 / 112 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+156% | 300 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 91,340 | 93,722+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 65,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,536 | 1,960+28% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 45,000+137% | 18,960 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 TB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the EPYC 7773X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB | 4 TB |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Platinum 8570 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7773X launched at $8800 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($8800 vs $9595), the EPYC 7773X is $795 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the EPYC 7773X the 6.1% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7773X | Xeon Platinum 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $8800-8% | $9595 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4+6% | 9.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













