
Xeon Gold 6338T
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8268
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6338T
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,163 less on MSRP ($3,139 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,801).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Xeon Gold 6338T
2021Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $3,163 less on MSRP ($3,139 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 104.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($3,139 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,801).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $3,139 MSRP).
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6338T better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 895 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 817 FPS | 877 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 872 FPS |
| ultra | 680 FPS | 787 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 895 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 813 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 698 FPS | 733 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 637 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 701 FPS | 736 FPS |
| medium | 616 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6338T and Xeon Platinum 8268

Xeon Gold 6338T
Xeon Gold 6338T
The Xeon Gold 6338T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,801 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 6338T and Xeon Platinum 8268 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6338T versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8268 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6338T uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6338T scores 35,801 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6338T. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6338T vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 35.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 35,801+2% | 35,081 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,046 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6338T uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6338T versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Xeon Gold 6338T supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6338T supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 6338T) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Gold 6338T) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Gold 6338T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Gold 6338T) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+79900% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 1024 GB+17476167% |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64+33% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6338T) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6338T rivals EPYC 7443P; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6338T launched at $3139 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($3139 vs $6302), the Xeon Gold 6338T is $3163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6338T delivers 11.4 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Xeon Gold 6338T the 68.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6338T | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3139-50% | $6302 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4+104% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













