
Xeon Gold 5416S
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8268
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,857 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 341.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,515).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,857 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 341.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,515).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5416S better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 888 FPS | 877 FPS |
| high | 888 FPS | 872 FPS |
| ultra | 835 FPS | 787 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 755 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 702 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 628 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 447 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 388 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 805 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 699 FPS | 733 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 637 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 736 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 461 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Platinum 8268

Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S
The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5416S packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5416S (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5416S scores 35,515 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB | 35.75 MB (total)+19% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 35,515+1% | 35,081 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,046 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4400+109900% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 1024 GB+26214300% |
| RAM Channels | 8+33% | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80+67% | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5416S launched at $1445 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($1445 vs $6302), the Xeon Gold 5416S is $4857 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5416S delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Xeon Gold 5416S the 126.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5416S | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1445-77% | $6302 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+339% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













