Xeon Gold 5416S vs Xeon Platinum 8268

Intel

Xeon Gold 5416S

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8268

24 Cores48 Thrd205 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 5416S

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $4,857 less on MSRP ($1,445 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
  • Delivers 341.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
  • Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
  • 66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Platinum 8268

2019

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,515).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
    • 36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
    • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5416S moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon Gold 5416S better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
    Yes. Xeon Gold 5416S is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5416S is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon Gold 5416S is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 5416S is $4,857 cheaper on MSRP at $1,445 MSRP versus $6,302 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 341.5% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon Gold 5416S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    1080p
    low186 FPS194 FPS
    medium153 FPS157 FPS
    high128 FPS126 FPS
    ultra100 FPS98 FPS
    1440p
    low146 FPS159 FPS
    medium115 FPS124 FPS
    high93 FPS96 FPS
    ultra72 FPS76 FPS
    4K
    low68 FPS72 FPS
    medium57 FPS60 FPS
    high45 FPS47 FPS
    ultra36 FPS38 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    1080p
    low244 FPS424 FPS
    medium214 FPS370 FPS
    high179 FPS303 FPS
    ultra151 FPS249 FPS
    1440p
    low206 FPS366 FPS
    medium187 FPS322 FPS
    high160 FPS266 FPS
    ultra133 FPS212 FPS
    4K
    low133 FPS228 FPS
    medium122 FPS203 FPS
    high111 FPS180 FPS
    ultra93 FPS148 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    1080p
    low888 FPS877 FPS
    medium888 FPS877 FPS
    high888 FPS872 FPS
    ultra835 FPS787 FPS
    1440p
    low855 FPS731 FPS
    medium755 FPS632 FPS
    high702 FPS600 FPS
    ultra628 FPS537 FPS
    4K
    low546 FPS468 FPS
    medium447 FPS368 FPS
    high388 FPS328 FPS
    ultra317 FPS269 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    1080p
    low888 FPS877 FPS
    medium805 FPS848 FPS
    high699 FPS733 FPS
    ultra600 FPS637 FPS
    1440p
    low711 FPS736 FPS
    medium621 FPS646 FPS
    high536 FPS555 FPS
    ultra461 FPS476 FPS
    4K
    low494 FPS531 FPS
    medium441 FPS473 FPS
    high395 FPS416 FPS
    ultra338 FPS361 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5416S and Xeon Platinum 8268

    Intel

    Xeon Gold 5416S

    The Xeon Gold 5416S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 35,515 points. Launch price was $944.

    Intel

    Xeon Platinum 8268

    The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.

    Processing Power

    The Xeon Gold 5416S packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5416S (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5416S scores 35,515 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 5416S. L3 cache: 30 MB on the Xeon Gold 5416S vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.

    FeatureXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    Cores / Threads
    16 / 32
    24 / 48+50%
    Boost Clock
    4 GHz+3%
    3.9 GHz
    Base Clock
    2 GHz
    2.9 GHz+45%
    L3 Cache
    30 MB
    35.75 MB (total)+19%
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (per core)+100%
    1 MB (per core)
    Process
    Intel 7 nm-50%
    14 nm
    Architecture
    Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
    Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
    PassMark
    35,515+1%
    35,081
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    24,500
    Geekbench 6 Single
    1,394
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    12,046
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Xeon Gold 5416S uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4400 on the Xeon Gold 5416S versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Xeon Gold 5416S supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5416S supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 1024 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Gold 5416S offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA4677 (Xeon Gold 5416S) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).

    FeatureXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    Socket
    LGA4677
    LGA3647
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 4.0+33%
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    4400+109900%
    DDR4-2933
    Max RAM Capacity
    4096
    1024 GB+26214300%
    RAM Channels
    8+33%
    6
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    80+67%
    48
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5416S) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5416S rivals EPYC 8124P; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.

    FeatureXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    Integrated GPU
    No
    No
    IGPU Model
    None
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    Yes
    Yes
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    High-end Server
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Xeon Gold 5416S launched at $1445 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($1445 vs $6302), the Xeon Gold 5416S is $4857 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5416S delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Xeon Gold 5416S the 126.1% better value option.

    FeatureXeon Gold 5416SXeon Platinum 8268
    MSRP
    $1445-77%
    $6302
    Performance per Dollar
    24.6+339%
    5.6
    Release Date
    2023
    2019