Xeon Platinum 8260 vs Xeon Silver 4514Y

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260

24 Cores48 Thrd165 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Silver 4514Y

16 Cores32 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Platinum 8260

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 22,000).
  • Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4514Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4514Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4514Y

2023

Why buy it

  • +18.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
  • 66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8260 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Silver 4514Y better than Xeon Platinum 8260?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8260 is ahead with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4514Y pulls ahead with 18.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4514Y is the better fit. You are getting 18.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Silver 4514Y is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8260 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Silver 4514Y is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it gives you 18.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8260 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8260 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (76.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Silver 4514Y is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
1080p
low194 FPS165 FPS
medium158 FPS144 FPS
high127 FPS114 FPS
ultra98 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low158 FPS136 FPS
medium123 FPS116 FPS
high96 FPS90 FPS
ultra76 FPS73 FPS
4K
low72 FPS63 FPS
medium60 FPS57 FPS
high46 FPS44 FPS
ultra38 FPS35 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
1080p
low423 FPS217 FPS
medium368 FPS194 FPS
high300 FPS164 FPS
ultra247 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low365 FPS183 FPS
medium321 FPS169 FPS
high264 FPS146 FPS
ultra210 FPS118 FPS
4K
low228 FPS119 FPS
medium202 FPS111 FPS
high178 FPS97 FPS
ultra146 FPS78 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
1080p
low768 FPS766 FPS
medium649 FPS694 FPS
high600 FPS662 FPS
ultra530 FPS587 FPS
1440p
low573 FPS686 FPS
medium467 FPS604 FPS
high425 FPS573 FPS
ultra372 FPS510 FPS
4K
low411 FPS464 FPS
medium321 FPS376 FPS
high286 FPS342 FPS
ultra232 FPS283 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
1080p
low768 FPS766 FPS
medium768 FPS751 FPS
high753 FPS648 FPS
ultra655 FPS553 FPS
1440p
low752 FPS691 FPS
medium659 FPS606 FPS
high566 FPS521 FPS
ultra486 FPS441 FPS
4K
low542 FPS478 FPS
medium483 FPS434 FPS
high424 FPS388 FPS
ultra366 FPS334 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4514Y

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8260

The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Intel

Xeon Silver 4514Y

The Xeon Silver 4514Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,621 points. Launch price was $780.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8260 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8260 uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8260 scores 30,720 against the Xeon Silver 4514Y's 30,621 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 22,000 (17.3% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,190 vs 2,100, a 55.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,946 vs 14,000 (67.4% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4514Y.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
Cores / Threads
24 / 48+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+15%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+20%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
35.75 MB (total)+19%
30 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP (2018)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
30,720
30,621
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,500
22,000+19%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,190
2,100+76%
Geekbench 6 Multi
6,946
14,000+102%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Platinum 8260 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260 versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — the Xeon Silver 4514Y supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4514Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4514Y). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) — the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4514Y).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
Socket
LGA3647
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
DDR5-4400+25%
Max RAM Capacity
1024 GB
4096 GB+300%
RAM Channels
6
8+33%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
80+67%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation, Xeon Silver 4514Y targets Mainstream Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Silver 4514Y rivals EPYC 8212.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8260Xeon Silver 4514Y
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Server / Workstation
Mainstream Server / Virtualization