
Xeon Platinum 8260
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4514Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Platinum 8260
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 22,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4514Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4514Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Silver 4514Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8260 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon Platinum 8260
2019Xeon Silver 4514Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 165W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 48) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (18,500 vs 22,000).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4514Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4514Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8260 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4514Y better than Xeon Platinum 8260?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 423 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 78 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 766 FPS |
| medium | 649 FPS | 694 FPS |
| high | 600 FPS | 662 FPS |
| ultra | 530 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 573 FPS | 686 FPS |
| medium | 467 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 464 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 283 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 766 FPS |
| medium | 768 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 753 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 655 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 752 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 486 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8260 and Xeon Silver 4514Y

Xeon Platinum 8260
Xeon Platinum 8260
The Xeon Platinum 8260 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,720 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Xeon Silver 4514Y
Xeon Silver 4514Y
The Xeon Silver 4514Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 30,621 points. Launch price was $780.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8260 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8260 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8260 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8260 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8260 uses the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8260 scores 30,720 against the Xeon Silver 4514Y's 30,621 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8260. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,500 vs 22,000 (17.3% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,190 vs 2,100, a 55.3% lead for the Xeon Silver 4514Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,946 vs 14,000 (67.4% advantage for the Xeon Silver 4514Y). L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8260 vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4514Y.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB (total)+19% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 30,720 | 30,621 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,500 | 22,000+19% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,190 | 2,100+76% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,946 | 14,000+102% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8260 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4514Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8260 versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4514Y — the Xeon Silver 4514Y supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4514Y supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 1024 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (Xeon Platinum 8260) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4514Y). PCIe lanes: 48 (Xeon Platinum 8260) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4514Y) — the Xeon Silver 4514Y offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8260) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4514Y).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-4400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 GB | 4096 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 8+33% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 80+67% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8260 targets Server / Workstation, Xeon Silver 4514Y targets Mainstream Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8260 rivals Xeon Gold 6248R; Xeon Silver 4514Y rivals EPYC 8212.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8260 | Xeon Silver 4514Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Server / Workstation | Mainstream Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













