
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.8% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,231 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (73,387 vs 74,985).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.8% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,231 less on MSRP ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($2,495 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 280W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (73,387 vs 74,985).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $2,495 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX better than Xeon Gold 6548Y+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 777 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 447 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 631 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 661 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 604 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 597 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 455 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 436 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1212 FPS | 946 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 924 FPS | 737 FPS |
| ultra | 818 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 949 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 826 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 609 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 604 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 527 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6548Y+


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 74,985 points. Launch price was $3,299.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Xeon Gold 6548Y+ share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX scores 74,985 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 2.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+10% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+113% | 60 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Chagall PRO (2022) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 74,985+2% | 73,387 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 53,977 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,686 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 29,745 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5200+129900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB+52428700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX rivals Xeon Gold 6338; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX launched at $2495 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($2495 vs $3726), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is $1231 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX delivers 30.1 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX the 41.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495-33% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1+53% | 19.7 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












