EPYC 9274F vs Xeon Gold 6548Y+

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9274F

24 Cores48 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9274F

24 / 48

73,982

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

32 / 64

73,387

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9274F

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $666 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (73,387 vs 73,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).

EPYC 9274F

2022

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.1% higher average FPS across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $666 less on MSRP ($3,060 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($3,060 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 250W instead of 320W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌28% higher power demand at 320W vs 250W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9274F across 40 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (73,387 vs 73,982).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 24.2 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $3,060 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9274F better than Xeon Gold 6548Y+?

Yes. EPYC 9274F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 32.1% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 9274F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.1% more average FPS across 40 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 60 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9274F is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 60 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9274F is the smarter buy today. EPYC 9274F is $666 cheaper on MSRP at $3,060 MSRP versus $3,726 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.1% average FPS lead across 40 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 22.8% better value on MSRP (24.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9274F Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6548Y+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
1080p
low	218 FPS	185 FPS
medium	180 FPS	162 FPS
high	154 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	191 FPS	153 FPS
medium	152 FPS	129 FPS
high	125 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	88 FPS	70 FPS
medium	75 FPS	62 FPS
high	59 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9274F Open Xeon Gold 6548Y+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
1080p
low	637 FPS	542 FPS
medium	556 FPS	485 FPS
high	449 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	392 FPS	360 FPS
1440p
low	538 FPS	473 FPS
medium	478 FPS	423 FPS
high	397 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	327 FPS	303 FPS
4K
low	334 FPS	295 FPS
medium	300 FPS	266 FPS
high	269 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	240 FPS	218 FPS

Open EPYC 9274F Open Xeon Gold 6548Y+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
1080p
low	817 FPS	892 FPS
medium	690 FPS	807 FPS
high	624 FPS	748 FPS
ultra	545 FPS	659 FPS
1440p
low	616 FPS	764 FPS
medium	518 FPS	687 FPS
high	461 FPS	633 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	564 FPS
4K
low	441 FPS	506 FPS
medium	352 FPS	425 FPS
high	310 FPS	379 FPS
ultra	247 FPS	316 FPS

Open EPYC 9274F Open Xeon Gold 6548Y+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
1080p
low	1138 FPS	946 FPS
medium	1015 FPS	851 FPS
high	875 FPS	737 FPS
ultra	784 FPS	639 FPS
1440p
low	881 FPS	777 FPS
medium	775 FPS	680 FPS
high	655 FPS	587 FPS
ultra	571 FPS	503 FPS
4K
low	624 FPS	567 FPS
medium	564 FPS	509 FPS
high	488 FPS	450 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	386 FPS

Open EPYC 9274F Open Xeon Gold 6548Y+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9274F and Xeon Gold 6548Y+

EPYC 9274F

The EPYC 9274F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.05 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 73,982 points. Launch price was $3,060.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+

The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9274F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9274F versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 4.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 9274F (base: 4.05 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9274F uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9274F scores 73,982 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 9274F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9274F vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Cores / Threads	24 / 48	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+5%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.05 GHz+62%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+327%	60 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Genoa (2022−2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	73,982	73,387

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9274F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9274F versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9274F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9274F) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9274F) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the EPYC 9274F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9274F) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	4800	5200+8%
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9274F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). Direct competitor: EPYC 9274F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.

Feature	EPYC 9274F	Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9274F launched at $3060 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($3060 vs $3726), the EPYC 9274F is $666 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9274F delivers 24.2 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the EPYC 9274F the 20.4% better value option.