
EPYC 7402
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6444Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7402
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,839 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 270W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6444Y across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,012 vs 47,176).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6444Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6444Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 270W vs 180W.
EPYC 7402
2019Xeon Gold 6444Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,839 less on MSRP ($1,783 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 270W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.1% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6444Y across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,012 vs 47,176).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6444Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 270W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6444Y better than EPYC 7402?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 303 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 645 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 1005 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 949 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 862 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 880 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 777 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 722 FPS |
| ultra | 307 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 328 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 820 FPS | 1179 FPS |
| medium | 746 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 907 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 767 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 806 FPS |
| high | 492 FPS | 681 FPS |
| ultra | 422 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 448 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 431 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7402 and Xeon Gold 6444Y

EPYC 7402
EPYC 7402
The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.

Xeon Gold 6444Y
Xeon Gold 6444Y
The Xeon Gold 6444Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 47,176 points. Launch price was $1,517.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7402 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6444Y offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6444Y — a 17.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6444Y (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The EPYC 7402 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6444Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7402 scores 46,012 against the Xeon Gold 6444Y's 47,176 — a 2.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6444Y. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402 vs 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6444Y.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.35 GHz | 4 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 45 MB+41% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 46,012 | 47,176+3% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 28,546 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,299 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,622 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7402 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6444Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 versus 5600 on the Xeon Gold 6444Y — the Xeon Gold 6444Y supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7402) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6444Y) — the EPYC 7402 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6444Y).
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5600+139900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6444Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6444Y). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242; Xeon Gold 6444Y rivals EPYC 9384X.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server / Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7402 launched at $1783 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6444Y debuted at $3622. On MSRP ($1783 vs $3622), the EPYC 7402 is $1839 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7402 delivers 25.8 pts/$ vs 13.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6444Y — making the EPYC 7402 the 65.8% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7402 | Xeon Gold 6444Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1783-51% | $3622 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.8+98% | 13.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













