
EPYC 7473X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6442Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7473X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 768 MB vs 60 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6442Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,022 less on MSRP ($2,878 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.3 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 240W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (60 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,534 vs 59,280).
EPYC 7473X
2022Xeon Gold 6442Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 768 MB vs 60 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,022 less on MSRP ($2,878 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 33.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.3 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $3,900 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 240W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($3,900 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6442Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (60 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,534 vs 59,280).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 7473X better than Xeon Gold 6442Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 461 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 266 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 998 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 940 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 853 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 718 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 645 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 325 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 994 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 887 FPS |
| high | 777 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 763 FPS |
| medium | 670 FPS | 669 FPS |
| high | 573 FPS | 575 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 551 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7473X and Xeon Gold 6442Y

EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X
The EPYC 7473X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,280 points. Launch price was $3,900.

Xeon Gold 6442Y
Xeon Gold 6442Y
The Xeon Gold 6442Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,534 points. Launch price was $2,065.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 7473X and Xeon Gold 6442Y share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7473X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6442Y (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 7473X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6442Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7473X scores 59,280 against the Xeon Gold 6442Y's 58,534 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 7473X. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7473X vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6442Y.
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+8% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+1180% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 59,280+1% | 58,534 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7473X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6442Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7473X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — the Xeon Gold 6442Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7473X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6442Y) — the EPYC 7473X offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7473X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6442Y).
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon Gold 6442Y supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 7473X rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Xeon Gold 6442Y rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7473X launched at $3900 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y debuted at $2878. On MSRP ($3900 vs $2878), the Xeon Gold 6442Y is $1022 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7473X delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 20.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6442Y — making the Xeon Gold 6442Y the 28.9% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7473X | Xeon Gold 6442Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3900 | $2878-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2 | 20.3+34% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













