
Xeon Gold 6421N
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6448Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,215 less on MSRP ($2,368 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 60,449).
Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Xeon Gold 6448Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,215 less on MSRP ($2,368 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.8 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 225W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6448Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 60,449).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ❌21.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 185W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6448Y better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 956 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 837 FPS | 1006 FPS |
| high | 793 FPS | 929 FPS |
| ultra | 705 FPS | 843 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 774 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 780 FPS |
| high | 623 FPS | 710 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 638 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 391 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 342 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 321 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 923 FPS | 972 FPS |
| medium | 832 FPS | 875 FPS |
| high | 717 FPS | 756 FPS |
| ultra | 619 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 715 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 488 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 367 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6421N and Xeon Gold 6448Y

Xeon Gold 6421N
Xeon Gold 6421N
The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.

Xeon Gold 6448Y
Xeon Gold 6448Y
The Xeon Gold 6448Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,449 points. Launch price was $3,583.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 6421N and Xeon Gold 6448Y share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6448Y — a 13% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6448Y (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture using a Intel 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6421N scores 58,797 against the Xeon Gold 6448Y's 60,449 — a 2.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6448Y. Both processors carry 60 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 60 MB | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 58,797 | 60,449+3% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6448Y).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon Gold 6448Y rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6421N launched at $2368 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6448Y debuted at $3583. On MSRP ($2368 vs $3583), the Xeon Gold 6421N is $1215 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6421N delivers 24.8 pts/$ vs 16.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6448Y — making the Xeon Gold 6421N the 38.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6421N | Xeon Gold 6448Y |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2368-34% | $3583 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.8+47% | 16.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













