
Xeon Gold 6262
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11955M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6262
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 21,823).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $623 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6262
2019Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 24 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 21,823).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $623 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Xeon Gold 6262?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6262 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6262 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6262 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 442 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 283 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6262 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6262 and Xeon W-11955M

Xeon Gold 6262
Xeon Gold 6262
The Xeon Gold 6262 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA 3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,823 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6262 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 32.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon W-11955M is built on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6262 scores 21,823 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6262. L3 cache: 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6262 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+200% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 5 GHz+39% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.1 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB+38% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | — | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,823 | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6262 uses the LGA 3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6262 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA 3647 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













