
Core 5 120
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6262
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA 3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 21,823).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $340 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6262
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA 3647 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 5 120
2025Xeon Gold 6262
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA 3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 21,823).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 33 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6262, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $340 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6262 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA 3647 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120 better than Xeon Gold 6262?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 408 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 335 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Xeon Gold 6262

Core 5 120
Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Xeon Gold 6262
Xeon Gold 6262
The Xeon Gold 6262 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA 3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 21,823 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6262 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6262 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6262 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core 5 120 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core 5 120 is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Xeon Gold 6262's 21,823 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6262. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6262.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 24 / 48+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+25% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+32% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 33 MB+83% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 21,823 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6262 uses LGA 3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 6262 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA 3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













