
Core 5 120
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7736U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7736U across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 21,696).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $340 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7736U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7736U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7736U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core 5 120 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core 5 120
2025Ryzen 7 7736U
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core 5 120 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7736U across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 21,696).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $340 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7736U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7736U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7736U better than Core 5 120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 496 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 347 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 534 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 541 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 120 and Ryzen 7 7736U

Core 5 120
Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.


Ryzen 7 7736U
Ryzen 7 7736U
The Ryzen 7 7736U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,696 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7736U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 7736U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7736U — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7736U (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7736U uses Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Ryzen 7 7736U's 21,696 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 7736U. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7736U.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Rembrandt-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 21,696 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 12,768 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,869 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 8,020 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 7736U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 7736U). The Ryzen 7 7736U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core 5 120 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7736U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7736U rivals Core i7-1255U.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Ryzen 7 7736U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












