
Xeon 6353P
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6252
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6353P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,910 vs 27,148).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6353P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6353P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6353P
2025Xeon Gold 6252
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,910 vs 27,148).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6353P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6353P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6353P better than Xeon Gold 6252?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6353P | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6353P | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6353P | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 679 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 657 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 263 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6353P | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 673 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 679 FPS |
| ultra | 652 FPS | 609 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 673 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 673 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 458 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6353P and Xeon Gold 6252

Xeon 6353P
Xeon 6353P
The Xeon 6353P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,910 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon Gold 6252
Xeon Gold 6252
The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6353P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Xeon 6353P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 6353P (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6353P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6353P scores 26,910 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6252. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6353P vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.
| Feature | Xeon 6353P | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+38% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+29% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+49% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,910 | 27,148 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6353P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon 6353P | Xeon Gold 6252 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













