
Xeon Gold 6226R
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6230
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6230
2019Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,076 vs 26,278).
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Xeon Gold 6230
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,076 vs 26,278).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6226R better than Xeon Gold 6230?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 648 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 648 FPS |
| ultra | 576 FPS | 563 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 657 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 444 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6226R and Xeon Gold 6230

Xeon Gold 6226R
Xeon Gold 6226R
The Xeon Gold 6226R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,278 points. Launch price was $1,300.

Xeon Gold 6230
Xeon Gold 6230
The Xeon Gold 6230 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,076 points. Launch price was $1,894.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6226R packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6230 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6230 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6226R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6230 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6226R scores 26,278 against the Xeon Gold 6230's 26,076 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 6226R. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6226R vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 40+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+38% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 27.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 20 MB+25% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,278 | 26,076 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,419 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,529 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 6226R) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6230). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6230 targets Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6230 rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6226R | Xeon Gold 6230 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server / Multi-thread computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













