
Xeon E-2468
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6226R
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2468 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,278 vs 26,652).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2468
2023Xeon Gold 6226R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2468 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,278 vs 26,652).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2468 better than Xeon Gold 6226R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2468 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon E-2468 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 616 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 522 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 467 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 232 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon E-2468 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon E-2468 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 666 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 666 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 652 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 666 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 666 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 535 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E-2468 and Xeon Gold 6226R

Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.

Xeon Gold 6226R
Xeon Gold 6226R
The Xeon Gold 6226R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 26,278 points. Launch price was $1,300.
Processing Power
The Xeon E-2468 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6226R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6226R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6226R — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E-2468 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6226R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E-2468 scores 26,652 against the Xeon Gold 6226R's 26,278 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E-2468. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6226R.
| Feature | Xeon E-2468 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+33% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 2.9 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+9% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB+700% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 26,652+1% | 26,278 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E-2468 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6226R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E-2468 | Xeon Gold 6226R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













