
Xeon Gold 6152
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6222V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6152
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6222V across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,254 vs 24,287).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6152
2017Xeon Gold 6222V
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6222V across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,254 vs 24,287).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6222V better than Xeon Gold 6152?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 456 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 607 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 606 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 607 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 607 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 412 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 318 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6152 and Xeon Gold 6222V

Xeon Gold 6152
Xeon Gold 6152
The Xeon Gold 6152 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30.25 MB. L2 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,287 points. Launch price was $3,655.

Xeon Gold 6222V
Xeon Gold 6222V
The Xeon Gold 6222V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,254 points. Launch price was $1,600.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6152 packs 22 cores / 44 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6222V offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6152 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6152 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6222V — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6152 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6152 uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6222V uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6152 scores 24,287 against the Xeon Gold 6222V's 24,254 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6152. L3 cache: 30.25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6152 vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6222V.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 22 / 44+10% | 20 / 40 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+17% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30.25 MB+10% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 22 MB+10% | 20 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,287 | 24,254 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6152) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6222V). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6152 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6152 | Xeon Gold 6222V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












